Welcome
Who is Catullus?  Links
Catullus Forum   Search Translations
 

  Available Korean translations:  
 
1 2 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 14b 15 16 17 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
52 53 54 55 56 57 58 58b 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 78b 79
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
90 91 92 93 94 95 95b 96 97 98
99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108
109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116
 

  Available languages:  
 
Latin
Afrikaans   Albanian   Arabic
Brazilian Port.   Bulgarian   Castellano
Catalan   Chinese   Croatian
Czech   Danish   Dutch
English   Esperanto   Estonian
Finnish   French   Frisian
German   Greek   Gronings
Hebrew   Hindi   Hungarian
Interlingua   Irish   Italian
Japanese   Korean   Limburgs
Norwegian   Persian   Polish
Portuguese   Rioplatense   Romanian
Russian   Scanned   Serbian
Spanish   Swedish   Telugu
Turkish   Ukrainian   Vercellese
Welsh  
 

  Gaius Valerius Catullus     
About Me
Send a Reaction
Read Reactions
 

 
Catullus Forum

Main  ::  Translations - per Carmen  ::  Carmen 63  ::  Notes 2 and 6 resolved

<<  •  >>

AuthorMessage
Guest
Posted on Fri Apr 06, 2018 16:42:36  
Dear M. van Wevelingen,

I have for you the explanation of your doubts expressed in footnote 2. Tetigere (35) is a shortened version of the 3rd plural perfect tetigerunt, probably used to fit the metre. Ferar (6 and ferat (79) are both subjunctive forms of ferre. Ferat is the 3rd sing subj pres act, which is used to form a final subclause in combination with ut(i). Ferar is the 1st sing subj pres pass and is used in a main clause. This use of the subjunctive also explains your misconception in note 6, namely that future tenses express finality, like in Greek (which I assume you derive from ero (69), colam (7 and agam (71). Even though future tenses in a question do express doubt, they don't express finality. The final expression is more clear when these verbs (with the exception of ero) are seen as subjunctive forms. Subjunctives in interrogative main clauses are called dubitative, and express a final doubt ("what must I do?"). So it makes more sense to see colam and agam as subjunctive (even though morphologically they can be future tenses), because ferar is a subjunctive as well. Ero forms an exception because there is no subjunctive for 'esse', here the future tense is used as a substitute.

Hope this helps
 


  � copyright 1995-2010 by Rudy Negenborn
   Nedstat