Welcome
Who is Catullus?  Links
Catullus Forum   Search Translations
 

  Available Frisian translations:  
 
1 2 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 14b 15 16 17 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
52 53 54 55 56 57 58 58b 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 78b 79
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
90 91 92 93 94 95 95b 96 97 98
99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108
109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116
 

  Available languages:  
 
Latin
Afrikaans   Albanian   Arabic
Brazilian Port.   Bulgarian   Castellano
Catalan   Chinese   Croatian
Czech   Danish   Dutch
English   Esperanto   Estonian
Finnish   French   Frisian
German   Greek   Gronings
Hebrew   Hindi   Hungarian
Interlingua   Irish   Italian
Japanese   Korean   Limburgs
Norwegian   Persian   Polish
Portuguese   Rioplatense   Romanian
Russian   Scanned   Serbian
Spanish   Swedish   Telugu
Turkish   Ukrainian   Vercellese
Welsh  
 

  Gaius Valerius Catullus     
About Me
Send a Reaction
Read Reactions
 

 
Catullus Forum

Main  ::  Translations - per Carmen  ::  Carmen 49  ::  Delicous Hidden Meanings

<<  •  >>

AuthorMessage
Sunshine
Posted on Fri May 18, 2007 03:49:54  
We discussed Carmen 49 in my Latin class, and we had an interesting topic of discussion: is Catullus truly so humble that he feels he is the least of poets, or is he making a jab at Cicero? Does he truly respect Cicero, or does he resent him for defending sucessfully Caelius, the man for whom Lesbia left Catullus?
Guest
Posted at Fri Nov 09, 2007 03:19:35  Quote
While it's very valid to recognize the inherent possible almost sarcastic tone of the delivery, you are in very dangerous waters by confusing the poetic voice with the poet himself.

It's truly not a healthy exercise to attempt to pin historic events (or our guess at historical events) onto a poet. It's a great thing to know, but ultimately the analysis of the poem can't be broken down into "Catullus wrote this because of this". Don't jump into the poet's shoes.

It's probably best, from my perspective and those of some very smart people, thus, to limit such endeavors in analysis. Stick with what the text gives you. The almost hyperbolic grandiloquence of the opening lines gives the most credence to the subtle attack on Cicero, so it's valid to make that argument. It's just bringing Clodia (not mentioned in the poem), and Claudius (also not mentioned) into the mix that takes a step too far.
Chris Weimer
Posted at Fri Nov 16, 2007 07:14:48  Quote
Quote:
  It's truly not a healthy exercise to attempt to pin historic events (or our guess at historical events) onto a poet. It's a great thing to know, but ultimately the analysis of the poem can't be broken down into "Catullus wrote this because of this". Don't jump into the poet's shoes.

This is one of the primary movements coming to the fore in Catullan studies. T. P. Wiseman was a huge advocate of it, to the point of denying that Clodia was Lesbia (I think the identification is valid), and later authors are warning against reading Catullus' biography from his poems.

While it's smart to warn caution, I also think it's anachronistic to demarcate clearly the poet from the poetic voice. As we saw from Cicero's few lines, as we see from Lucretius, and as we see from Vergil, the poetic voice is often from the POV of the poet himself. It's standard identification practices to see if the biography matches up with the poem.

While it is dangerous to say "He's making fun of Cicero because Cicero did this or that", it's not dangerous to say that Catullus was probably not on the best terms with Cicero because of the events that transpired. The events are connected with Catullus through a long and arduous process, but I've yet to see a work that has successfully refuted the notion that Lesbia is Clodia, that has torn down the pavement between the two. Even Wiseman in his Catullus and His World makes some allowance for the identification.

Chris Weimer
Guest
Posted at Wed Nov 21, 2007 00:13:16  Quote
Quote:
  I've yet to see a work that has successfully refuted the notion that Lesbia is Clodia, that has torn down the pavement between the two. Even Wiseman in his Catullus and His World makes some allowance for the identification.

Try "Lesbia, the Poet, and the Two Faces of Sappho: Womanufacture in Catullus" by Holzberg.
Chris Weimer
Posted at Fri Nov 30, 2007 02:51:25  Quote
Quote:
  Try "Lesbia, the Poet, and the Two Faces of Sappho: Womanufacture in Catullus" by Holzberg.

Thanks, I'll have to look into it.
 


  � copyright 1995-2010 by Rudy Negenborn
   Nedstat